Difference between revisions of "Talk:1951 NAIA Men's Basketball District Regionals"
From Varsity Pride
(Created page with 'I'm not sure that there was a District 27, as that would have implied that there was a Tennessee-only district. But there were playoffs that involved teams from AL, MS and TN bef…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I'm not sure that there was a District 27, as that would have implied that there was a Tennessee-only district. But there were playoffs that involved teams from AL, MS and TN before 1951. I don't know how you would handle this Jon, but I think there should be a combined District 19-27 slot for 1951. | + | I'm not sure that there was a District 27, as that would have implied that there was a Tennessee-only district. But there were playoffs that involved teams from AL, MS and TN before 1951. I don't know how you would handle this Jon, but I think there should be a combined District 19-27 slot for 1951. [[User:Howard|Howard]], 19:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC) |
| + | * My rationale here was that District 19 WAS represented in every year up until the district was reassigned to Pennsylvania. I think the best thing to do is openly acknowledge our confusion on the matter until we have something more concrete. [[User:Jon|Jon]] 19:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:37, 24 December 2011
I'm not sure that there was a District 27, as that would have implied that there was a Tennessee-only district. But there were playoffs that involved teams from AL, MS and TN before 1951. I don't know how you would handle this Jon, but I think there should be a combined District 19-27 slot for 1951. Howard, 19:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- My rationale here was that District 19 WAS represented in every year up until the district was reassigned to Pennsylvania. I think the best thing to do is openly acknowledge our confusion on the matter until we have something more concrete. Jon 19:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
