Get to Know: Big Sky Conference

I’m going to try and knock out two of these every day through December 10.  I’ll be going through each division alphabetically, but I’ve arranged my output schedule to balance the divisions out somewhat (in other words, I’m not doing all the FCS conferences first then moving on to Division II).  The conferences which play football are going first, and should be wrapped up by mid-November; then I’ll hit the hoops-only leagues.

There will be a lot of basic info in these abstracts which you can get anywhere (Wikipedia represent!, I guess).  But I’ll be trying to limit that information to what’s needed to convey the flavor of each conference.  I’ll touch on the intriguing parts of their histories, give you an idea how successful they’ve been in the post-season, discuss unique challenges facing them, and attempt to pinpoint key rivalries and whatnot.  For leagues which sponsor both football and basketball, I’ll discuss both — with the exception of the FCS leagues, because when it comes to basketball they’re no different than the FBS leagues and thus they’re beyond the scope of what I’m trying to do here.

And so, we begin our 57-day-long (fingers crossed) journey in the Rockies and beyond with the Big Sky Conference.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: ,

What’s the Difference?

Most people who’ve already found this blog probably don’t need the information I’m about to impart, mostly because the only people to whom this blog has been “advertised” so far possess above-average sports knowledge.  But some people do, so I’ll throw it out there.

What information is that?  The difference between Division I, II, III, NAIA, and between FBS and FCS.

Read the rest of this entry »

NAIA: Week Seven.

I don’t have much to say by way of preamble regarding the NAIA, so let’s just get on down to it.  The same method which I used for Division I FCS actually does work well for the NAIA despite a low voter total.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:

Division III: Week Seven.

As I stated in the introductory post, Division III is very well covered by two fantastic sites, D3football.com and D3hoops.com.  If you’re really interested in digging deeper, I cannot, cannot, cannot recommend them more highly.

My attempt at ranking the conferences in Division III simply does not work, unfortunately.  Here’s the problem: there are only 40 voters in the AFCA D-III poll.  There are 38 D-III football conferences, plus the independents.  There are 25 slots on each ballot.

I’m sure you can see the problem now.  Using my rankings, five conferences plus the independents would score a big fat zero, and another 8 conferences would have scores so low that they’re completely irrelevant — including one that actually has a ranked team.

So we’re not using that method here; indeed, I’m not even going to bother posting it as a comment like I did with Division II.  Massey it is.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:

Division II: Week Seven.

My conference rankings for Division II… well, let’s just say they’re not nearly as instructive as the rankings I did for FCS.  That’s because the Division II poll only has 26 voters, which creates the exact opposite situation that the FCS poll creates as far as using total votes as a metric.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:

Division I FCS: Week Seven.

The first half of the 2010 season has seen some brilliance on the part of the reduced-scholarship D-I crowd.  We all know what James Madison did to Virginia Tech, and that was just the pinnacle.

But, as much as these FCS-over-FBS wins are nice and all, that’s not what we’re here to discuss.  This being the first post, I’m going to give a rundown of relative conference strength among the FCS conferences.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:

Our Glorious Statement of Intent.

What am I doing here?  Well, let me tell you, internets.

You’re a college football fan, or a college basketball fan.  You visit the usual sports websites.  ESPN, CNN/SI, Sporting News, CBS Sportsline.  They’ve got all the information you could ever possibly want on the BCS leagues, and most of the information you could ever possibly want on the mid-majors (and if basketball’s your thing, you’ve got Kyle Wheliston for that).   Division I revenue sports are so thoroughly covered that there’s really no need for any more coverage.

Meanwhile, Division I FCS, Division II, Division III, the NAIA… wasteland.  Well, okay, Division III is actually extremely well-covered by the good folks at D3football.com and D3hoops.com, and the NAIA covers itself, somewhat, with some help from Victory Sports, but I’ll address this more in a bit.

You can get scores no problem, of course; ESPN isn’t so full of journalistic lassitude that they fail to provide this.  But it’s just scores with no context.  You can’t even get conference standings until midway through the season.  And let’s be honest: a wall of scores is totally useless to a casual observer.

I did not attend a lower-level institution.  Indeed, I attended a BCS school.  My primary concern, as a fan, is and always will be what’s happening with my school.  But I am also a sports fan, right?  As such, I have always at least been curious about what’s going on down there in the dark, where the schools which are not cash-churning athletic factories toil in relative obscurity.  I think a lot of other people are, too… or would be, if it weren’t difficult to get into.

The sites I mentioned above are fantastic, really.  The Division III sites cover D-III sports with a zeal which rivals the attention paid to BCS schools by ESPN and the like.  If you’re actually a die-hard D-III fan, that’s perfect.  If you’re just generally curious… it’s not, so much.  This isn’t to say that if you’re just curious, you shouldn’t visit them — in fact, you can expect linkage to them from this blog.  It’s just that unless you’re already into D-III, diving into the D-III sites can be a little daunting.  The reason for this is pretty obvious once you do; D-III has twice as many teams as D-I.  Twice as many conferences.  Far less inter-regional play, too, and as a sports fan you probably don’t need to be told what impact that has on your comprehension of just what’s going on down there.

So: what am I doing here?  My interest in lower-division sports has forced me to learn far more about them than I actually “wanted” to initially.  I was curious; I was forced to become, if not an “expert”, at least “extremely well-versed”.  As I said previously, I think there are a lot of folks who are curious; they’d like to know what’s going on in the lower divisions, but simply don’t have the time to immerse themselves.

I’m going to solve that problem for you, gentle reader.  Each week, I’ll provide a rundown of what’s important, and what’s interesting.  Occasionally, I’ll go a little more in-depth, either because I feel the need to, or simply due to capricious whim; in the main, however, I want to keep this simple and direct.

Let me be clear: this blog (and, eventually, community of sorts, I hope) is intended for a specific audience: other folks like me, whose primary loyalty is to one of the Big Boys, but who wants to understand Those Other Guys.  That should not, however, imply that if you’re primarily a fan of the lower division schools, you’re not welcome.  Indeed, we’ll want you in the commentariat; you provide the perspective.  After all, one of the greatest things about BCS-level sports in the internet age is that we can share our rivalries and experience glorious schadenfreude and declare ourselves allies for a day in the face of the enemy and all that other good stuff that makes being a sports fan great.  For those of us who don’t live and die by your school’s team, that’s actually another reason it’s hard for us to appreciate it.  You can help us understand.

I realize I’m starting this mess in the middle of a football season.  Unfortunate in most respects, perhaps, but I think it’s a better method of getting off the ground (at least in terms of “my ability to do so”).  If I were trying to start this in pre-season, I would probably feel compelled to try and give a pre-season preview, and that would make it more difficult to provide the accessibility I’m looking for.  I think.  We’ll see.

Lastly, although I’m relatively certain this won’t impact anyone at all, since I don’t expect to have any actual readers for some time… please bear with the format and appearance until I get it settled.  Rather than spend a bunch of time working on the visual details here, I decided to just start writing, because rather than wanting to be a writer, I decided it was time to just be a damned writer.  Writers write, right?

Welcome!

Tags: